State v. Prado is one of the most powerful tools available for beating your driving charges.
Let’s say you’re happily driving down the road. You hear your tires hit the rumble strip and, the next thing you know, red and blue lights are flashing in your rear view mirror. Are you in serious trouble? Maybe not…
Police often stop drivers for minor infractions and seek to expand their investigation into more serious offenses. One of most common minor infractions police use to stop drivers is crossing over lane lines or fog lines. The law, RCW 46.61.140, requires drivers keep their cars “as nearly as practicable entirely within a single lane and shall not be moved from such lane until the driver has first ascertained that such move can be made with safety.” But that’s not the end of the story.
Washington, and several other states, have the exact same law. The courts agree that simply crossing over the lane markers once or twice – so long as no one is put in danger – is not enough for an officer to pull you over.
State v. Prado is the lead case in Washington. The Court of Appeals ruled that Mr. Prado’s driving, where he crossed over a fog line once, was not bad enough to justify an officer pulling him over. It went even further, saying that sometimes accidentally crossing out of your lane more than once may not be a good enough reason to pull you over.
You can use Prado to win your traffic case. The traffic stop may be unlawful if the police officer stopped you for crossing over a line on the roadway. An unlawful stop can be the key to suppressing the evidence against you. Without evidence, the prosecution will be hard pressed to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Let me help you, contact me today to discuss your case.